Xbox Modding Trial – Fair use not allowed


Bummer – we wanted to see/hear Bunnie do a live Xbox hack before a jury

…Crippen suffered a devastating blow to his defense last week when the judge prohibited the defendant from raising a “fair use” defense. He had hoped to argue to jurors that it was legal to hack the consoles because the modification had non-infringing purposes, like allowing the machines to run homebrew software, or permitting limited fair use of copyright material. The judge ruled that such a defense is not permitted by the DMCA.

8-6-2021 (August 6, 2021) is the Snakiest day of the year and it’s also this year’s CircuitPython Day! The day highlights all things CircuitPython and Python on Hardware. See you there!

Stop breadboarding and soldering – start making immediately! Adafruit’s Circuit Playground is jam-packed with LEDs, sensors, buttons, alligator clip pads and more. Build projects with Circuit Playground in a few minutes with the drag-and-drop MakeCode programming site, learn computer science using the CS Discoveries class on, jump into CircuitPython to learn Python and hardware together, TinyGO, or even use the Arduino IDE. Circuit Playground Express is the newest and best Circuit Playground board, with support for CircuitPython, MakeCode, and Arduino. It has a powerful processor, 10 NeoPixels, mini speaker, InfraRed receive and transmit, two buttons, a switch, 14 alligator clip pads, and lots of sensors: capacitive touch, IR proximity, temperature, light, motion and sound. A whole wide world of electronics and coding is waiting for you, and it fits in the palm of your hand.

Join 30,000+ makers on Adafruit’s Discord channels and be part of the community!

Have an amazing project to share? The Electronics Show and Tell is every Wednesday at 7pm ET! To join, head over to YouTube and check out the show’s live chat – we’ll post the link there.

Join us every Wednesday night at 8pm ET for Ask an Engineer!

Follow Adafruit on Instagram for top secret new products, behinds the scenes and more

CircuitPython – The easiest way to program microcontrollers –

Maker Business — Over 500,000 manufacturing jobs are going unfilled

Wearables — Cut from the middle

Electronics — Here’s the deal with BJT power

Python for Microcontrollers — Python on Microcontrollers Newsletter: Welcome to CircuitPython Day 2021! #Python #Adafruit #CircuitPython @micropython @ThePSF

Adafruit IoT Monthly — Forest Fire Beacons, IoT for Beginners, and more!

Microsoft MakeCode — MakeCode for the micro:bit - 2021 Release!

EYE on NPI — Maxim’s Himalaya uSLIC Step-Down Power Module #EyeOnNPI @maximintegrated @digikey

New Products – Adafruit Industries – Makers, hackers, artists, designers and engineers! — JP’s Product Pick of the Week — 4pm Eastern TODAY! 8/3/21 @adafruit @johnedgarpark #adafruit #newproductpick

Get the only spam-free daily newsletter about wearables, running a "maker business", electronic tips and more! Subscribe at !


  1. Call me naive, but isn’t the judicial system *supposed* to hear the arguments and make adjustments to the law as needed? This ruling effectively says, “you can’t defend yourself because the law says so”. Our checks and balances are seriously broken, if you ask me.

  2. A hack a day keeps the DMCA at bay. :-/

  3. @K Scharf

    Interesting point:- "DMCA prohibits the sale of any device or mod to enable fair use"

    That makes it fine if someone gives me there old xbox or I pick one up from a junk yard because I did not buy it.

    PS: Love the "prove you are human by reading this resistor"

  4. @signal7: strictly speaking, no. The judicial system, specifically the judicial branch of the government, is supposed to hear arguments and decide if what is being described is inside or outside the limits of the law. This branch cannot (and should not) actually make or change any laws.

    That’s what the legislative branch is for.

    That said, they’re all a bunch of clowns.

  5. @signal7: No, in the United States, the judicial system is not supposed to make adjustments to the law. It can only interpret the law. From my (admittedly limited) understanding of both the DMCA and the iPhone copyright exception, the judge’s interpretation is correct.

    It sounds to me like the judge understands DMCA better than the defense. I think he was saying that defense is invalid because it’s basically admitting to the crime, which is not a defense at all. Since circumvention to enable fair use is illegal, then a defense claiming you were circumventing for fair use is nonsensical.

    The DMCA is a terrible contrivance, evidence of either the incredible ignorance of the legislature when it comes to technical matters, or possibly just their willingness to be bought by monied interests. However, it’s law, and the judicial system can’t change it except by ruling it unconstitutional. It’s up to Congress to free us of this draconian mess. I’m not holding my breath.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.