For years, EFF has been warning that the anti-circumvention provisions of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act can be used to chill speech, particularly security research, because legitimate researchers will be afraid to publish their results lest they be accused of circumventing a technological protection measure. We’ve also been concerned that the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act could be abused to try to make alleged contract violations into crimes.
We’ve never been sorrier to be right.
Stop breadboarding and soldering – start making immediately! Adafruit’s Circuit Playground is jam-packed with LEDs, sensors, buttons, alligator clip pads and more. Build projects with Circuit Playground in a few minutes with the drag-and-drop MakeCode programming site, learn computer science using the CS Discoveries class on code.org, jump into CircuitPython to learn Python and hardware together, or even use Arduino IDE. Circuit Playground Express is the newest and best Circuit Playground board, with support for MakeCode, CircuitPython, and Arduino. It has a powerful processor, 10 NeoPixels, mini speaker, InfraRed receive and transmit, two buttons, a switch, 14 alligator clip pads, and lots of sensors: capacitive touch, IR proximity, temperature, light, motion and sound. A whole wide world of electronics and coding is waiting for you, and it fits in the palm of your hand.
Get the only spam-free daily newsletter about wearables, running a "maker business", electronic tips and more! Subscribe at AdafruitDaily.com !
So we are supposed to boycott a company that sells cutting-edge technology? I think not. Our own US Government is in the same thing with Wikileaks, what are you going to boycott the USG also?
“are you going to boycott the USG also?”
Seriously, though, I don’t consider myself to be boycotting Sony on principle – I just don’t trust them. Why would I buy something from a company that makes it clear that I don’t truly own my purchases? (read the legal documents that were published – apart from claims related to distribution of information, they make no secret that they consider a user tinkering with his own device to be “illegal tampering” with “their” property.)
As the people of Make says:
"If you can’t open it, you don’t own it"