EE Bookshelf: The ‘Sound’ of Capacitors

Today’s bookshelf isn’t a datasheet or a book. It’s actually just a webpage (which I suppose would make it an ‘EE bookmark‘), but it’s one that I like a lot, so I figured I’d share it.

Which capacitors sound better than others? Or perhaps, which ones distort the least? This is a contentious topic among audiophiles, musicians, DIY synth builders and occasionally HAMs as well. I don’t actually want to wade into this argument. My main purpose in writing this post is to share with you this excellent webpage over at greygum.net. I keep this one near the top of my bookmarks folder, and make sure it stays there when I migrate to a new computer.

This page dates from 1999, but the information is still good. It’s also a great example of an awesome late-90’s webpage.

The author, Steve, performed some tests to find the D-E curve of various types of capacitors (his test set-up is described at the bottom of the page). The results can be eye-opening.

The two worst performers on that page were electrolytics (which exhibit marked hysteresis, particularly the tantalum, above), and ceramic monolithics, which have  very noticeable distortion. The one thing both electrolytics and monolithics have in common is their relatively compact size, achieved in part by use of a very thin dielectric. It’s interesting to see that the high-voltage monolithic has less distortion than it’s low-voltage counterpart, perhaps in part because the HV version has a thicker and/or different dielectric.

While I had known from long-time experience that ceramic and electrolytic caps can muck up the signal path, I never had any data (visual or otherwise) to back it up — until I read about Steve’s experiment a few years ago. As such, I tend to relegate these caps to decoupling and bypassing, and use something else for anything that touches signal, usually polypropylene film.

Check out Steve’s page and see for yourself, and be sure to check out his followup on electrolytics as well.

Make a robot friend with Adafruit’s CRICKIT – A Creative Robotics & Interactive Construction Kit. It’s an add-on to our popular Circuit Playground Express, FEATHER and other platforms to make and program robots with CircuitPython, MakeCode, and Arduino. Start controlling motors, servos, solenoids. You also get signal pins, capacitive touch sensors, a NeoPixel driver and amplified speaker output. It complements & extends your boards so you can still use all the goodies on the microcontroller, now you have a robotics playground as well.

Join 7,500+ makers on Adafruit’s Discord channels and be part of the community! http://adafru.it/discord

CircuitPython in 2018 – Python on Microcontrollers is here!

Have an amazing project to share? Join the SHOW-AND-TELL every Wednesday night at 7:30pm ET on Google+ Hangouts.

Join us every Wednesday night at 8pm ET for Ask an Engineer!

Follow Adafruit on Instagram for top secret new products, behinds the scenes and more https://www.instagram.com/adafruit/

Maker Business — Rethink Robotics closes shop. Long live collaborative robots #makerbusiness

Wearables — Zip it up

Electronics — Serial overkill

Biohacking — Biohacking Resources – Books, Talks and Podcasts

Python for Microcontrollers — CircuitPython creates new assistive tech opportunities

Get the only spam-free daily newsletter about wearables, running a "maker business", electronic tips and more! Subscribe at AdafruitDaily.com !

1 Comment

  1. I too, don’t want to wade into all of the psuedoscientific nonsense surrounding this topic, but I will say this-

    If you are building some kind of audio gadget, and are looking for a specific sound, you most likely will be disappointed if you focus only on the capacitor type. You must also look at the rest of the circuit- at the very least, the stage where the cap is located. Other components will have a profound effect on the “contributions” made by any cap, magic or otherwise.

    Of course, the best advice is to ignore anything that can’t be explained by scientific theory and sound engineering design practice, and of course, trust your ears. The human brain is very good at fooling itself, especially when it comes to buying into fashionable nonsense (The e
    extraordinary popular delusions and the madness of crowds, if you will).

    Learning a little about basic analog engineering and psycho-acoustics will get you much farther during your search for that special “sound.” That will put you miles ahead of the casual tinkerers who often come to well-intentioned, but erroneous conclusions due to their lack of knowledge of the basics.

    Finally- with the ready availability of cheap DSP technology, almost any “sound” can be modelled with a good parametric equalizer (and perhaps a compressor) and a little skill.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.