The “Respects Your Freedom” computer hardware product certification program encourages the creation and sale of hardware that will do as much as possible to respect your freedom and your privacy, and will ensure that you have control over your device.
Here are the requirements. It looks like if you use Eagle you can’t be certified, it’s a little unclear if you can use Mac or Windows to make the open hardware even if you use free tools, we’re going to check out the list of requirements.
Here’s an interesting requirement…
…the seller must talk about “free software” more prominently than “open source.
FSF & hardware seems to be diverging (or converging?) from past statements by FSF’s Richard Stallman.
Because copying hardware is so hard, the question of whether we’re allowed to do it is not vitally important. I see no social imperative for free hardware designs like the imperative for free software – Richard Stallman — On “Free Hardware”
We are angry, frustrated, and in pain because of the violence and murder of Black people by the police because of racism. We are in the fight AGAINST RACISM. George Floyd was murdered, his life stolen. The Adafruit teams have specific actions we’ve done, are doing, and will do together as a company and culture. We are asking the Adafruit community to get involved and share what you are doing. The Adafruit teams will not settle for a hash tag, a Tweet, or an icon change. We will work on real change, and that requires real action and real work together. That is what we will do each day, each month, each year – we will hold ourselves accountable and publish our collective efforts, partnerships, activism, donations, openly and publicly. Our blog and social media platforms will be utilized in actionable ways. Join us and the anti-racist efforts working to end police brutality, reform the criminal justice system, and dismantle the many other forms of systemic racism at work in this country, read more @ adafruit.com/blacklivesmatter
Stop breadboarding and soldering – start making immediately! Adafruit’s Circuit Playground is jam-packed with LEDs, sensors, buttons, alligator clip pads and more. Build projects with Circuit Playground in a few minutes with the drag-and-drop MakeCode programming site, learn computer science using the CS Discoveries class on code.org, jump into CircuitPython to learn Python and hardware together, TinyGO, or even use the Arduino IDE. Circuit Playground Express is the newest and best Circuit Playground board, with support for CircuitPython, MakeCode, and Arduino. It has a powerful processor, 10 NeoPixels, mini speaker, InfraRed receive and transmit, two buttons, a switch, 14 alligator clip pads, and lots of sensors: capacitive touch, IR proximity, temperature, light, motion and sound. A whole wide world of electronics and coding is waiting for you, and it fits in the palm of your hand.
Get the only spam-free daily newsletter about wearables, running a "maker business", electronic tips and more! Subscribe at AdafruitDaily.com !
I’m not sure I follow how Eagle would break the requirements in a hardware scenario. Eagle is not software that you’d steer a user of a hardware product towards. Eagle is not needed to USE a hardware product. You only need it if you want to make a copy of the hardware itself.
Particularly in light of the fact that they make exceptions for non-free software for stuff like FPGA gate patterns, it seems like a hardware circuit designed in Eagle should be fine.
Royce: By that logic then using Alitum Designer or (shoot me now) Cadence should be ok.
I’m more put off by the “bounty for voilations” and the “free software” vs. “open source” (lets not even talk about the GNU/Linux BS).
It almost seems that since BSD and GPL licensed stuff has hit mainstream the FSF has decided they need to push harder.
An FSF guy left a comment over at Hack-A-Day that clinches it, I think. No requirements on hardware design files. You don’t even have to provide them at all.