Stop breadboarding and soldering – start making immediately! Adafruit’s Circuit Playground is jam-packed with LEDs, sensors, buttons, alligator clip pads and more. Build projects with Circuit Playground in a few minutes with the drag-and-drop MakeCode programming site, learn computer science using the CS Discoveries class on code.org, jump into CircuitPython to learn Python and hardware together, TinyGO, or even use the Arduino IDE. Circuit Playground Express is the newest and best Circuit Playground board, with support for CircuitPython, MakeCode, and Arduino. It has a powerful processor, 10 NeoPixels, mini speaker, InfraRed receive and transmit, two buttons, a switch, 14 alligator clip pads, and lots of sensors: capacitive touch, IR proximity, temperature, light, motion and sound. A whole wide world of electronics and coding is waiting for you, and it fits in the palm of your hand.
Have an amazing project to share? The Electronics Show and Tell is every Wednesday at 7pm ET! To join, head over to YouTube and check out the show’s live chat – we’ll post the link there.
Get the only spam-free daily newsletter about wearables, running a "maker business", electronic tips and more! Subscribe at AdafruitDaily.com !
Although I agree with their rewording, it is much clearer and better. I do disagree to their assertion that “there is no legitimate reason for a software vendor to keep the code of their software secret”. I am a software engineering and the source code for a lot of companies needs to remain closed for the business model to work.
If I spend a year writing a game for mobile and release it and the source code then there is little I can do to stop someone re-branding it and selling it under their own name. Many of us do not have the resources to take someone to court and by the time it is resolved all the profit has been removed.
In short, I can not make a living if I were forced to give away all my work.
I do release code that I write at home in my spare time and contribute to open source projects.