0

Quantified Gender Tracking

National Geographic has interviewed Fawna Stockwell who figured out a way to track gender identity experiences. Fawna who was born female decided to track three metrics:

  • distress 0-10
  • identity [male <–> female]
  • expression through clothing

Fawna’s findings indicated that being male had a higher level of discomfort.


Make a robot friend with Adafruit’s CRICKIT – A Creative Robotics & Interactive Construction Kit. It’s an add-on to our popular Circuit Playground Express, FEATHER and other platforms to make and program robots with CircuitPython, MakeCode, and Arduino. Start controlling motors, servos, solenoids. You also get signal pins, capacitive touch sensors, a NeoPixel driver and amplified speaker output. It complements & extends your boards so you can still use all the goodies on the microcontroller, now you have a robotics playground as well.

Join 7,500+ makers on Adafruit’s Discord channels and be part of the community! http://adafru.it/discord

CircuitPython in 2018 – Python on Microcontrollers is here!

Have an amazing project to share? Join the SHOW-AND-TELL every Wednesday night at 7:30pm ET on Google+ Hangouts.

Join us every Wednesday night at 8pm ET for Ask an Engineer!

Follow Adafruit on Instagram for top secret new products, behinds the scenes and more https://www.instagram.com/adafruit/


Maker Business — Fewer startups, and other collateral damage from the 2018 tariffs

Wearables — Light as a Worbla feather

Electronics — How to make your own magnetic field probe!

Biohacking — The State of DNA Analysis in Three Mindmaps

Python for Microcontrollers — One year of CircuitPython weeklies!

Get the only spam-free daily newsletter about wearables, running a "maker business", electronic tips and more! Subscribe at AdafruitDaily.com !



1 Comment

  1. Love this! What a unique data set!

    I would quibble with your observation that their findings “indicated that being male had a higher level of discomfort,” because their findings actually seemed, simply, to numerically demonstrate gender dysphoria. Their level of distress was highest when their gender identity was different from their gender assigned at birth.

    I’m sure you didn’t mean any harm in your analysis, but it implies a universality in the way that it’s worded which probably wasn’t intended. If you want to make that observation more specific, it might be better stated “Fawna’s findings indicated that at times when they identified as male, they experienced a higher level of discomfort.”

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.