MACHINE LEARNING – Questions for Google about the Duplex demo #ai #machinelearning @googleio #googleio

A few days ago, during the keynote at Google I/O, Sundar Pichai demoed a project called Duplex, a system whereby its voice assistant technology is applied to tasks like booking appointments, making restaurant reservations, or discovering opening hours of businesses.

It’s a striking demo, if you haven’t watched it. It contains a couple of recorded calls wherein Duplex, posing as a human, conducts conversations leading to a haircut appointment and discovering that a restaurant doesn’t take reservations for parties of fewer than 5.

There’s a post on the Google AI blog about Duplex that goes into more detail about the implementation, and mentions that difficult situations may be passed off to a human operator, though it claims that Duplex is able to handle most interactions completely autonomously.

It also makes some claims about transparency:

The Google Duplex technology is built to sound natural, to make the conversation experience comfortable. It’s important to us that users and businesses have a good experience with this service, and transparency is a key part of that. We want to be clear about the intent of the call so businesses understand the context. We’ll be experimenting with the right approach over the coming months.

…which sounds reassuring, but the sample call audio raises some pretty serious questions.

  1. Will the voice assistant (Duplex) announce that it is a digital assistant?
  2. Will Duplex state that the call is being recorded and analyzed, and will there be a public data retention policy available? In other words, where are all the calls stored, for how long, etc.?
  3. Does Google get (or did they get) permission for the demos at I/O from the salon and the restaurant?
  4. What tools and assurances will Google provide to make sure manipulation of humans who answer phones is not abused?
  5. If someone is called by Duplex and does not wish to be called, will there be a “do-not-duplex me” service?
  6. Will people be able to discover their own history of interacting with Duplex? Will third parties? What are the implications for the personal privacy of individual employees at businesses that receive Duplex calls?
  7. Does a voice assistant which retains data from calls violate wiretapping prohibitions?

There are complicated questions about whether technologies like Duplex (or any of Siri, Alexa, Google Search, etc.) constitute true “artificial intelligence”, but it’s clear that they’re having profound effects on human cognition, capabilities, and freedoms. Effects which will only increase in magnitude as the technology is refined and becomes ever-more pervasive in day to day life and the economy.

Google is already a corporation with almost unfathomable power to shape our society’s understanding of itself and the flow of our attention and knowledge about the world.  This is a power that’s only going to grow as it gets harder for people to tell the difference between talking to another human mind and talking to massive databases engineered to maximize corporate profits.  It’s past time that we articulate a clear expectation of the rights that human minds should retain in the face of this reality, and the responsibilities that builders of systems have to respect human consent and human freedom from cognitive manipulation.

Update: 5/10/18 – “Google says it’s designing Duplex with ‘disclosure built-in’

“We understand and value the discussion around Google Duplex — as we’ve said from the beginning, transparency in the technology is important,” a Google spokeswoman said in a statement. “We are designing this feature with disclosure built-in, and we’ll make sure the system is appropriately identified. What we showed at I/O was an early technology demo, and we look forward to incorporating feedback as we develop this into a product.”

Update: 5/17/18 – “What Google isn’t telling us about its AI demo

Axios asked Google for the name of the hair salon or restaurant, in order to verify both that the businesses exist and that the calls were not pre-planned. We also said that we’d guarantee, in writing, not to publicly identify either establishment (so as to prevent them from receiving unwanted attention).

A longtime Google spokeswoman declined to provide either name.

We also asked if either call was edited, even perhaps just cutting the second or two when the business identifies itself. And, if so, were there other edits? The spokeswoman declined comment, but said she’d check and get back to us. She didn’t.

Make a robot friend with Adafruit’s CRICKIT – A Creative Robotics & Interactive Construction Kit. It’s an add-on to our popular Circuit Playground Express, FEATHER and other platforms to make and program robots with CircuitPython, MakeCode, and Arduino. Start controlling motors, servos, solenoids. You also get signal pins, capacitive touch sensors, a NeoPixel driver and amplified speaker output. It complements & extends your boards so you can still use all the goodies on the microcontroller, now you have a robotics playground as well.

Join 7,500+ makers on Adafruit’s Discord channels and be part of the community! http://adafru.it/discord

CircuitPython in 2018 – Python on Microcontrollers is here!

Have an amazing project to share? Join the SHOW-AND-TELL every Wednesday night at 7:30pm ET on Google+ Hangouts.

Join us every Wednesday night at 8pm ET for Ask an Engineer!

Follow Adafruit on Instagram for top secret new products, behinds the scenes and more https://www.instagram.com/adafruit/

Maker Business — Despite multiple bankruptcies, RadioShack continues to find ways to keep the lights on

Wearables — Molding with glue

Electronics — A few words on inductor resistance

Biohacking — Running Blades

Python for Microcontrollers — Help bring CircuitPython to other languages!

Get the only spam-free daily newsletter about wearables, running a "maker business", electronic tips and more! Subscribe at AdafruitDaily.com !

No Comments

No comments yet.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.